Subject	Re: its more effecient to just turn the car off on a NA.
Posted by	SLINCO on January 18, 2003 at 9:25 PM
	This message has been viewed 23 times.
In Reply To	its more effecient to just turn the car off on a NA. posted by CaptanZap on January 18, 2003 at 01:46 PM
Message	Waaay late but I'm glad you're keeping the TT---still having tech days? keep me up on it please. 93 Stage III SAPPHIRE BLUE NA 90 Stage V+ PEARL BLACK TWINTURBO "Yeah my wife is still pissed I bought it, but the car rocks and I can outsource what she has to offer." CONMAN: on March 29, 2002 at 12:00 am What kind of drunk are you?
Follow Ups	turbo timer on a n/a?... - weasil50 13:23:07 01/18/03 so the engine will "cool down" (n/m) - Zboost 13:27:43 01/18/03 its more effecient to just turn the car off on a NA. - CaptanZap 13:46:51 01/18/03 I know, basically it's a waste of money. (n/m) - Zboost 14:21:31 01/18/03 Re: its more effecient to just turn the car off on a NA. - SLINCO 21:25:54 01/18/03 wrong (n/m) - sbsTT(MD) 14:34:09 01/18/03 Youre NA shouldnt get that hot anyways, if it did - JMT-Z(St. Louis) 13:37:06 01/18/03 was it the Apex'i unit? - sbsTT(MD) 14:37:13 01/18/03 yes, it was (n/m) - weasil50 16:22:29 01/18/03 Well, some timers like mine (HKS Type 1) can.... - xxbulovax91xx 15:16:59 01/18/03 No reason, Its not about cooling the engine---> - therinL 16:19:28 01/18/03 turbo timers are pimp shit, everyone should have one damnit! (n/m) - RookieZTT 17:07:53 01/18/03 There is none. (n/m) - YugoBernie (NoVA) 22:28:40 01/18/03
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.